Thursday, June 30, 2011

Price attorney denies reports of cash found, seeks search warrant - WFAA



DALLAS ? Meet Billy Ravkind. He is John Wiley Price's lawyer.

Even though no charges have been filed against the controversial Dallas County Commissioner, Ravkind is ready to fight for him.

He's already hired his own investigators.

"We've brought in forensic people to look at every one of his transactions from beginning to end to tell me if there is something wrong," Ravkind said.

The attorney is denying reports that claimed he said the government agents searching Price's home found $100,000 there in a safe.

"That's not true," Ravkind said, and that's all he would say about the search of Price's Oak Cliff residence.

"If there was money in his house, I'm telling you we can account for it," Ravkind said. "If it was there. I'm not going to confirm it was there; I'm not going to deny it was there."

Ravkind says that normally when the FBI conducts a search, it leaves a copy of the search warrant behind.

But after two days of asking, the government hasn't yet produced the document for Price's house; only the ones for his office, car and his assistant's home.

Without a proper warrant, anything seized from the house might be inadmissible as evidence; that's why Ravkind won't talk about cash on TV.

"I'm not here to forgive the government if they didn't have a warrant; that?s not my job," Ravkind said. "I won't have to talk about anything they have in the house if they don't have a warrant."

Price's attorney expects eventually there will be a warrant, indictments... and a trial. Job One is doing his own investigation of his client.

"We have retained two forensic groups, and that's their job ? not to tell me what I want to hear, but tell me what the records show. That's going to be the cars, the real estate... everything I've heard about."

Then the defense can really begin.

E-mail greaves@wfaa.com

Print
Email
Share

Source: http://www.wfaa.com/news/politics/Price-Attorney-Denies-Reports-of-Cash-Found-Asks-FBI-for-Search-Warrant-124752609.html

bankruptcy attorney albuquerque M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com

Monday, June 27, 2011

Casey Anthony Trial: Is Casey's attorney Cheney Mason fired? - 10 Connects

Orlando, Florida - The rule of thumb in the Casey Anthony murder trial is expect the unexpected. Just when you think you have it all figured out in the high-profile capital case, chaos ensues.

Such was the case on Saturday. It was Day 28, and Judge Belvin Perry warned everyone that it would be a full day.

WATCH: Live video of the Casey Anthony trial
FULL COVERAGE: The Casey Anthony murder trial

On most weekends, Saturday court proceedings have been half days. However, last week strayed from the norm in dramatic ways. Last Monday, the judge became so frustrated with both sides that he sent everyone home before the jury ever made it in the courtroom.

The defense was accused of not providing the opinions of a key witness to the state in order for prosecutors to prepare for cross examination.

Then, on Wednesday, the judge ordered a half-day due to a previously-scheduled budget meeting.

Each day was filled with stop and starts, due to continuous objections by both sides.

Crime Scene Photos: Pictures from where Caylee Anthony's body was found(Caution: Some pictures may be considered graphic)

More Pictures: Click here to see the photos Casey Anthony doesn't want you to see (Caution: pics contain some adult material: IE: Drinking, partial nudity)

Then, this past Saturday there was more drama that fueled rumors like wildfire among trial-watchers and legal analysts alike. Court proceedings were suddenly halted.

No reasons were given.

Defense counsel Cheney Mason told the judge that he needed to talk about some "issues" in the trial.

The hallway was full of witnesses ready to testify, but the jury never even made it into the courtroom. That's when Mason and Casey Anthony were seen going into the judge's nearby chambers.

WFTV reporter Kathi Belich�tweeted a statement saying that Mason was heard yelling in the judge's chambers.

Then, Casey was seen coming out of the room crying. That's when the bombshell dropped.

Judge Perry�made an announcement that shocked everyone and caused theories to begin circulating rapidly.

Perry called it a "legal issue."�And, that was it. Court was inexplicably adjourned until Monday morning.�

What was this all about? �And why was it that the defendant was seen staring down Mason on Friday. Were there problems within the defense team? �Was Casey fighting with her lawyers?

Does this mean that Cheney Mason could be fired?

The rumors are raging at this point. �Something to keep in mind is that Judge Perry told everyone in court that the "legal issue" at hand did not involve a previous argument that morning about a witness' testimony. Some say the "issue" could be a plea bargain. �Others say it is an attorney problem. �

Then, there are additional analysts who claim that discovery has continually been a problem for the defense. Casey's lawyers have faced issues in this case of not providing the state with opinions and findings of witnesses. Prosecutors have continually called out Baez. �The state claims it cannot properly prepare for cross examination without all findings being provided.

In fact, the judge made reference this very issue, saying it is "getting old" and that "some things never change." Judge Perry told lead defense counsel Jose Baez at one point earlier in the case that "violations, if there are any" would be dealt with at the close of trial.

The judge even made reference to the Florida Bar Association looking into some issues.

Baez was allowed to continue with his presentation of the case. However, some legal analysts are saying that the judge is only postponing the inevitable.

One analyst explained the analogy to 10 News, "You know when you've heard your mother say, 'Just wait until your father gets home' and that's when you'll really get in trouble? �That's similar to what the judge is saying here. �Baez can continue, but in the end, he could face sanctions."

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNHJSP5jlP8UzFvpXQIAYadFO4zx_Q&url=http://www.wtsp.com/news/article/198645/19/Casey-Anthony-Trial-Is-Caseys-attorney-Cheney-Mason-fired

bankruptcy attorney albuquerque M Daniels Law

Attorney Mitch Furman Launches New Website - PR Web (press release)

Chicago, IL (PRWEB) June 27, 2011

Those who are searching the web for a criminal defense attorney are usually extremely concerned about their future and need immediate help. Attorney Mitch Furman?s new site presents his practice as the professional and aggressive defense lawyer that he is, and allows those who are in need of his services to easily learn about his services, his history, and to easily contact him and enlist his services. Increasing his presence online cannot be underestimated as a marketing tool, as most people rarely search any other way other than online. The presentation of his practice created by the creative team at Scorpion Design, a law firm website design firm, gives him the clean, fresh and professional look needed to interest potential clients in the Chicago area.

As a Chicago criminal defense attorney, Mr. Furman has established a reputation as a hard-hitting and aggressive lawyer that is committed to seeking out the best options to defend his clients. Defending all types of serious criminal offenses, from DUI offenses, through to violent felony crimes, there are many Chicago area residents who seek out his help to fight for their freedom and to fight to avoid conviction in all types of criminal accusations. Trial ability is an important factor in any criminal case, and Mr. Furman has the experience and talent to present a compelling case for the defense, or negotiate on their behalf to reduce the damage to their future.

Also lending his education and experience to other areas of the law, such as business litigation, real estate law, personal injury and family law, Mr. Furman offers a broad range of practice areas to his clients, allowing them to develop a relationship that lasts with their attorney, rather than moving from practice to practice for their various legal issues. Whether facing a criminal charge, seeking a divorce, or dealing with a business or real estate matter, Attorney Mitch Furman has the experience and broad range of legal talents to assist.

Contact a Chicago attorney at law from Law Offices of Mitch Furman & Associates to find out more.

###


Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNEqyV0jj2_yTNnH-ZHnJL4QOp7UJw&url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/6/prweb8602477.htm

bankruptcy attorney albuquerque M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers

Attorney Mitch Furman Launches New Website - PRWeb

Chicago, IL (PRWEB) June 27, 2011

Those who are searching the web for a criminal defense attorney are usually extremely concerned about their future and need immediate help. Attorney Mitch Furman?s new site presents his practice as the professional and aggressive defense lawyer that he is, and allows those who are in need of his services to easily learn about his services, his history, and to easily contact him and enlist his services. Increasing his presence online cannot be underestimated as a marketing tool, as most people rarely search any other way other than online. The presentation of his practice created by the creative team at Scorpion Design, a law firm website design firm, gives him the clean, fresh and professional look needed to interest potential clients in the Chicago area.

As a Chicago criminal defense attorney, Mr. Furman has established a reputation as a hard-hitting and aggressive lawyer that is committed to seeking out the best options to defend his clients. Defending all types of serious criminal offenses, from DUI offenses, through to violent felony crimes, there are many Chicago area residents who seek out his help to fight for their freedom and to fight to avoid conviction in all types of criminal accusations. Trial ability is an important factor in any criminal case, and Mr. Furman has the experience and talent to present a compelling case for the defense, or negotiate on their behalf to reduce the damage to their future.

Also lending his education and experience to other areas of the law, such as business litigation, real estate law, personal injury and family law, Mr. Furman offers a broad range of practice areas to his clients, allowing them to develop a relationship that lasts with their attorney, rather than moving from practice to practice for their various legal issues. Whether facing a criminal charge, seeking a divorce, or dealing with a business or real estate matter, Attorney Mitch Furman has the experience and broad range of legal talents to assist.

Contact a Chicago attorney at law from Law Offices of Mitch Furman & Associates to find out more.

###


Source: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/6/prweb8602477.htm

bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm bankruptcy attorney albuquerque

DC's US Attorney makes cold cases a key priority - The Associated Press

DC's US Attorney makes cold cases a key priority

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Delonta Kelsey was shot dead five years ago behind the steering wheel of a car as he drove near Howard University with friends in the middle of the night. A brand-new father nicknamed "Scooter," he was four days shy of his 18th birthday, looking toward graduation at Cardozo Senior High School, passionate about rap music and intrigued by a future in emergency medical services.

His slaying remains unsolved, one of thousands of cold case homicides confronting the District of Columbia police department. With the homicide rate in precipitous decline over the past two decades, police and prosecutors have more time to dig through old cases. And authorities hope they'll solve even more of them through a partnership with the U.S. Attorney's office aimed at providing closer collaboration in wrapping up years-old homicides.

"This is something that I carry with me every day. To this moment, I'm kind of still in denial that Delonta is gone, and I have to really get myself together," said his mother, Rhonda Gaines. "There's not a day that goes by that he's not thought of."

U.S. Attorney Ronald Machen last fall assigned three veteran prosecutors, including one who successfully tried the Chandra Levy murder case, to work exclusively on cold case homicides. They partner with a team of homicide detectives who specialize in cold cases, meeting whenever new leads surface or when there's new evidence or witnesses to review. D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier has expressed a similar interest in closing cold cases.

For Machen, a former trial prosecutor who left the office for private practice before being sworn in as U.S. Attorney in February 2010, the commitment to cold cases is personal. The last case he tried, in 2001, involved a killing from five years earlier in which the defendant, Patrick Hewitt, fled to London after the slaying of a woman with whom he lived. He was caught with a forged passport trying to re-enter the country and was ultimately extradited and convicted of voluntary manslaughter.

"When you solve a cold case like that, it really sends a strong message to the community," Machen told The Associated Press. "It gets people to realize that even if they think they've gotten away, they haven't."

The crack epidemic that ravaged Washington throughout the 1980s and into the early 1990s contributed to a ghastly surge in homicides, many of which remain unsolved. But a steep drop in the number of killings over the past 20 years ? 479 in 1991 compared with 132 in 2010 ? has enabled homicide prosecutors more time to devote to cold cases.

Capt. Michael Farish, who commands the police department's homicide division, said the department has had a cold case squad for about 20 years. He said his detectives aren't doing anything different than before but that it's helpful to have a designated group of prosecutors to meet with, even if there's occasional tension on whether the evidence is enough to yield a conviction.

He likens the relationships to bonds forged by detectives who are experienced partners.

The three prosecutors were assigned to the cold case squad about six months ago. They include Amanda Haines, who successfully prosecuted Ingmar Guandique last year in Levy's murder, Deborah Sines and Vinet Bryant. Glenn Kirschner, former head of the office's homicide unit, also works with the squad, said Machen spokesman William Miller.

"They're tenacious, they're focused, they've got guts, they're willing to take that tough case," Farish said of the prosecutors. They're willing to say, he added, "We've got it ? it's going to be a tough road to hoe, but we'll go."

Cold cases present unique difficulties, including fading witness memory and deteriorating physical evidence, which may produce hurdles for prosecutors needing to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Machen has assigned one attorney, Michael Ambrosino, to focus on forensic evidence and help prosecutors on the science of a case.

Prosecutors say the partnership established by Machen is still too fresh to expect many convictions. It can take months if not years to track down a suspect, and months beyond that to reach trial. But there's no question police and prosecutors have either solved or secured big breaks in multiple high-profile cold cases in recent years, aided by some of the very same people involved in the current partnership.

Guandique was convicted last year in the 2001 murder of Levy, the intern whose disappearance captivated the nation. Also last year, prosecutors won a conviction in the case of Yolanda Baker, a young woman who went missing in 1999 and whose body was never found. A similar conviction came in 2008, when Michael Dickerson admitted killing ex-girlfriend Shaquita Bell and hiding her body just before she was to testify against him in an assault case.

Last month, Lanier announced that police had reclassified as a homicide the 1999 death of Joyce Chiang, an attorney whose decomposed body was found on the banks of the Potomac River months after she disappeared. Authorities have fingered two suspects ? one already in custody in another case, the other out of the country ? but have filed no charges.

The successes reflect what authorities say is a continued emphasis on cold cases.

"I do expect to see more charged cases this year than in past years," said Jeff Ragsdale, who heads the U.S. Attorney's Office homicide division.

Kelsey's mother, Gaines, said she's still grappling with her son's death. She knows of no one who wanted her son dead and assumes the bullet was intended for one of his friends in the car ? an assessment seconded by Dan Lewis, a detective who investigated and calls Kelsey a "very good kid, very well-raised."

Kelsey's killing may not be among the city's most high-profile unsolved cases, but memories of his death easily overwhelm Ashlea Johnson, his former girlfriend and the mother of their 5-year-old daughter Taylor ? a child who will never know her dad.

"He's missing out on raising his family, and his family is missing a father."

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNGrIM5ErQoOEankTlc0Dg9KaoBNMQ&url=http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i41-rI1ifJpKDeuTaLt6b85TYhGQ?docId=ba841a198b4b41078482e75cfdcd1d3d

M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Attorney General clarifies plan for fireworks at holiday party

At first it appeared that Attorney General Gary King might be openly defying Gov. Susana Martinez ? not to mention state fire officials.

An invitation to a July 3 party at the personal residence of the attorney general and his wife, Yolanda, told potential guests to expect "BBQ and Fireworks." The fireworks display would be conducted by Scott Scanland, a long-time lobbyist representing several clients in the state Legislature.

An anonymous tipster, who provided a copy of the invitation to The New Mexican, noted the irony of the attorney general shooting fireworks "as the entire state goes under a severe fire danger alert."

Indeed, just this week, the governor sent a news release "urging New Mexicans to refrain from using fireworks this summer due to the extremely dry weather conditions and serious fire season facing the state."

The message continued, "A statewide ban on the use of all fireworks, as well as on smoking, the use of campfires, open burning and open fires was enacted on April 16th by the State Forester for all state and private wildlands in New Mexico."

A spokeswoman for King verified the invitation was authentic, but said the attorney general won't risk causing a fire at his home off N.M. 41 south of Santa Fe.

"It is a template (the Kings) use every year," Lynn Southard said in explaining the flyer announcing the party. "If it does not rain, they will not actually shoot the fireworks, although they usually do this from an irrigated alfalfa field."

You must register with a valid email address and use your real name to comment on this forum. Previous usernames are no longer valid as of Feb. 5. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to contribute comments. If you need help logging in or establishing your new user name and password, please visit this tutorial.

All users are expected to abide by the forum rules and and be courteous to other users. Comments can be accepted up to eight days following publication. After that, comments can be read but no new submissions made. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com

IMPORTANT: Comments must be posted under your own full, real name. Anonymous comments and those posted under a pseudonym can be removed. Please consult the forum rules. If you have questions, e-mail webeditor@sfnewmexican.com.

Source: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/Sidebar/Attorney-General-clarifies-plan--for-fireworks-at-holiday-party

M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com

The Interview: Aaron Greenfield, attorney for Holocaust survivors and families - Baltimore Sun

Baltimore attorney Aaron Greenfield's work representing Holocaust survivors and their families earned him an invitation last month to join a special committee of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Greenfield, special counsel in the corporate practice group of Duane Morris LLP, was selected after he worked on state legislation requiring firms bidding on commuter rail contracts to disclose whether they had transported Holocaust victims to death camps during World War II. The measure was passed this year by the Maryland General Assembly and signed into law last month.

The legislation was proposed after a Rockville-based subsidiary of the French national railway, SNCF, bid on a contract to operate the MARC Camden and Brunswick lines. Historians say the French national railroad transported 76,000 Jews and others to death camps.

During a hearing in Annapolis in March, representatives of the subsidiary, Keolis America, and SNCF argued that the law would effectively bar Keolis from competing because of the costly and time-consuming documentation required. Last month, however, Keolis said it planned to submit a bid after all and hoped SNCF would provide the required documents.

The state Department of Transportation canceled its request for proposals last fall and has not yet issued a new one, but officials have said they expect to reopen the bidding process this summer.

Greenfield spoke with The Baltimore Sun about his work representing Holocaust survivors and his goals as a member of the lawyers' committee for the Washington-based museum, which is dedicated to documenting and studying the Holocaust.

How were you selected for the committee?

This all started based upon some work I've been doing over the past year in connection with representing 650 Holocaust survivors and family members from all over the world, including 11 in Maryland [along with law firm Akin Gump]. We were able to pass legislation in Maryland, the first [of its kind] in the country, that required [the] French national railroad to disclose its archives and post them online. This got some notice from folks on the lawyers' committee and they offered me a seat at the table.

What is the role of the committee and what will your role be?

It's to keep folks engaged in the cause ? and [involved in] education related to the Holocaust and all the good work the Holocaust museum does. The lawyers' committee engages lawyers from a lot of different firms and [oversees] a number of continuing education programs. ?

There have always been legal issues surrounding the Holocaust, whether it's human rights or property or social or economic injustice. The museum recognizes this and works hard with the legal community to understand those issues and the historical consequences that occurred.

My first objective is to attend these programs, listen and be an ambassador for the museum.

Tell me about your work representing survivors.

I read a year ago an article that struck me as problematic, a story about the French national railway's Keolis subsidiary [being] awarded a Virginia rail contract [with commuter rail Virginia Railway Express] and Holocaust survivors and family members were protesting the award. Maryland put out a MARC rail RFP [request for proposals] and Keolis was going to put out a bid. What I learned through reading and research is that SNCF took 76,000 Jews to death camps and was paid per head per kilometer. [The railroad] profited off the transportation of individuals and [has] never paid reparations, and now they were coming to us to pursue high-speed rail and commuter rail opportunities under the Obama stimulus.

I was so troubled by that story, and troubled that they would get taxpayers' dollars and that they had not apologized for their actions. I connected with folks at Akin Gump in D.C. who represented the 650 individuals [who were survivors or family members of people who had been transported]. I asked what can I do and got [the work] through my firm as [a] pro bono [case]. A group of us worked hard to get legislation introduced. It is the first passed to require a company to really work with [the] state archivist and post information online before they could be awarded a ? contract. The state cannot award them a contract until they do what the law requires them to do.

What information would be posted online and why is that important to disclose?

We want the names of those 76,000 individuals and any data [showing confiscated property]. It's listed in the law now, what specifically ? property, records. [The SNCF] may not have the property, but they have to have some documentation of jewelry, books, currency, precious metals, artifacts, records, any memos or receipts. This company ? and we have records ? invoiced the French government after [the war] for the per-head per-kilometer fee. They said [they] were coerced ? but coercion is not a defense.

What purpose will this legislation ultimately serve?

I don't think this could bring closure to the family members of the 76,000 who perished and [the] only 2 percent who survived. Nothing can provide closure and complete justice, but what the new law does provide is some sense of accountability and transparency. This isn't just a Maryland issue. It's international. It will be posted and anybody will have access. It's landmark in many ways. The 650 [existing] survivors [and family members] have been in litigation with the company for 10 years, and the company has argued it is an arm of the French government and is immune from any lawsuits.

What will happen if the company resubmits a bid for the MARC contract?

If they do decide to bid they're required to have the archivist work with them. They've made a number of assurances that they were OK with what we set forth and what was passed.

Lorraine.mirabella@baltsun.com

  • Text BUSINESS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun Business text alerts
  • '; railInsertionTarget.innerHTML = railInsertionTarget.innerHTML + railInsertionSource; } // console.log('\n This has finished running \n');

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNG9txZuRHIyeJl3-Ljd5W6FB1vONQ&url=http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-interview-aaron-greenfield-20110626,0,965935.story

    albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque albuquerque bankruptcy attorney albuquerque bankruptcy

    The Interview: Aaron Greenfield, attorney for Holocaust survivors and families - Baltimore Sun

    Baltimore attorney Aaron Greenfield's work representing Holocaust survivors and their families earned him an invitation last month to join a special committee of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

    Greenfield, special counsel in the corporate practice group of Duane Morris LLP, was selected after he worked on state legislation requiring firms bidding on commuter rail contracts to disclose whether they had transported Holocaust victims to death camps during World War II. The measure was passed this year by the Maryland General Assembly and signed into law last month.

    The legislation was proposed after a Rockville-based subsidiary of the French national railway, SNCF, bid on a contract to operate the MARC Camden and Brunswick lines. Historians say the French national railroad transported 76,000 Jews and others to death camps.

    During a hearing in Annapolis in March, representatives of the subsidiary, Keolis America, and SNCF argued that the law would effectively bar Keolis from competing because of the costly and time-consuming documentation required. Last month, however, Keolis said it planned to submit a bid after all and hoped SNCF would provide the required documents.

    The state Department of Transportation canceled its request for proposals last fall and has not yet issued a new one, but officials have said they expect to reopen the bidding process this summer.

    Greenfield spoke with The Baltimore Sun about his work representing Holocaust survivors and his goals as a member of the lawyers' committee for the Washington-based museum, which is dedicated to documenting and studying the Holocaust.

    How were you selected for the committee?

    This all started based upon some work I've been doing over the past year in connection with representing 650 Holocaust survivors and family members from all over the world, including 11 in Maryland [along with law firm Akin Gump]. We were able to pass legislation in Maryland, the first [of its kind] in the country, that required [the] French national railroad to disclose its archives and post them online. This got some notice from folks on the lawyers' committee and they offered me a seat at the table.

    What is the role of the committee and what will your role be?

    It's to keep folks engaged in the cause ? and [involved in] education related to the Holocaust and all the good work the Holocaust museum does. The lawyers' committee engages lawyers from a lot of different firms and [oversees] a number of continuing education programs. ?

    There have always been legal issues surrounding the Holocaust, whether it's human rights or property or social or economic injustice. The museum recognizes this and works hard with the legal community to understand those issues and the historical consequences that occurred.

    My first objective is to attend these programs, listen and be an ambassador for the museum.

    Tell me about your work representing survivors.

    I read a year ago an article that struck me as problematic, a story about the French national railway's Keolis subsidiary [being] awarded a Virginia rail contract [with commuter rail Virginia Railway Express] and Holocaust survivors and family members were protesting the award. Maryland put out a MARC rail RFP [request for proposals] and Keolis was going to put out a bid. What I learned through reading and research is that SNCF took 76,000 Jews to death camps and was paid per head per kilometer. [The railroad] profited off the transportation of individuals and [has] never paid reparations, and now they were coming to us to pursue high-speed rail and commuter rail opportunities under the Obama stimulus.

    I was so troubled by that story, and troubled that they would get taxpayers' dollars and that they had not apologized for their actions. I connected with folks at Akin Gump in D.C. who represented the 650 individuals [who were survivors or family members of people who had been transported]. I asked what can I do and got [the work] through my firm as [a] pro bono [case]. A group of us worked hard to get legislation introduced. It is the first passed to require a company to really work with [the] state archivist and post information online before they could be awarded a ? contract. The state cannot award them a contract until they do what the law requires them to do.

    What information would be posted online and why is that important to disclose?

    We want the names of those 76,000 individuals and any data [showing confiscated property]. It's listed in the law now, what specifically ? property, records. [The SNCF] may not have the property, but they have to have some documentation of jewelry, books, currency, precious metals, artifacts, records, any memos or receipts. This company ? and we have records ? invoiced the French government after [the war] for the per-head per-kilometer fee. They said [they] were coerced ? but coercion is not a defense.

    What purpose will this legislation ultimately serve?

    I don't think this could bring closure to the family members of the 76,000 who perished and [the] only 2 percent who survived. Nothing can provide closure and complete justice, but what the new law does provide is some sense of accountability and transparency. This isn't just a Maryland issue. It's international. It will be posted and anybody will have access. It's landmark in many ways. The 650 [existing] survivors [and family members] have been in litigation with the company for 10 years, and the company has argued it is an arm of the French government and is immune from any lawsuits.

    What will happen if the company resubmits a bid for the MARC contract?

    If they do decide to bid they're required to have the archivist work with them. They've made a number of assurances that they were OK with what we set forth and what was passed.

    Lorraine.mirabella@baltsun.com

  • Text BUSINESS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun Business text alerts
  • '; railInsertionTarget.innerHTML = railInsertionTarget.innerHTML + railInsertionSource; } // console.log('\n This has finished running \n');

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNG9txZuRHIyeJl3-Ljd5W6FB1vONQ&url=http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-interview-aaron-greenfield-20110626,0,965935.story

    bankruptcy attorney albuquerque M Daniels Law

    Biggs woman sentenced to three years for embezzlement - Enterprise-Record

    YUBA CITY ? A Biggs woman was sentenced Friday to three years in prison for embezzling $203,000 while working as an office manager for a Yuba City dentist, according to the Sutter County District Attorney's Office.

    Tiffany Lynae Lovell, 31, used money stolen between 2005 and 2010 to buy jewelry, electronics and clothing, some of which she gave to family and friends, according to a Sutter County Probation Department report.

    Lovell is also suspected of spending some of the money for cosmetic surgery, including breast augmentation, the report said.

    Lovell worked for dentist Michael A. Passaglia at 421 Del Norte Ave. The embezzlement included charging personal items on a company credit card and altering time sheets to collect money for days she did not work.

    Judge Chris Chandler gave Lovell the mid-term sentence of two years for embezzlement, plus another year for stealing more than $65,000, said Assistant District Attorney Jana McClung.

    When she came under suspicion, Lovell "cleaned out" office computers to erase records of her theft, McClung said.

    According to the report, the theft ended up costing Passaglia $338,838, including the cost of an investigation.

    Passaglia declined comment when Lovell was charged last year. In a letter to the court, he said Lovell, who had no prior criminal record, should go to prison instead of receiving probation.

    "During the entire time Miss Lovell worked for me I was aware that she was a high maintenance employee, but

    due to how hard she seemed to work and her Oscar winning performances on how much she did for this office, I believed her and put up with the daily drama in the office between her and other employees," Passaglia wrote.

    In interviews with authorities, Lovell blamed the thefts on being abused by her father as a child and on subsequent mistreatment by other men.

    Passaglia wrote in the letter that she filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against him to pressure him into dropping charges.

    Deputy Probation Officer Amy Arndt wrote in the report that Lovell has "made strides" in counseling since her arrest but still accepts only partial responsibility.

    Starting in November, Lovell began receiving $2,560 per month in disability payments, according to the report.

    Passaglia wrote that if he ever turned to a life of crime, he would want Lovell as his partner.

    "With her devious abilities, we would make Bonnie and Clyde look like rank amateurs," he wrote.

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNGMZFSzes71IRTeH37_VRjkrGgMQQ&url=http://www.chicoer.com/news/ci_18356507

    bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm bankruptcy attorney albuquerque M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer

    Dallas Texas Auto Accident Attorney News: How Will 'Loser Pays' Effect Dallas Citizens? - 24-7PressRelease.com

    ����June 26, 2011 /EIN Presswire/ -- Texan politicians are walking a tight line between working for Texas residents to preserve and protect legal rights and aiding large corporations with the filing of the 'Loser Pays' bill state the Dallas Texas Auto Accident Attorneys at 1800-Car-Wreck. Backed by Governor Rick Perry, state Senators Joan Huffman and Brandon Creighton have submitted bills proposing a loser pays tort reform initiative.

    Dallas Texas Auto Accident Attorneys explain that a loser pays system would most impact Texas' middle to lower class and small businesses by placing them at a disadvantage when facing a big corporation in court. In systems such as the one proposed by Huffman and Creighton, if a court or jury determines a lawsuit is frivolous the losing party is held responsible for paying the defendants court. This idea of a frivolous lawsuit filer paying court costs means that even if a plaintive wins a verdict they could still be forced to pay the defendant's legal costs if the suit is deemed unnecessary explains the Dallas Texas Auto Accident Attorneys. When dealing with astronomical legal fees from big businesses, this is an expense that most Texans cannot risk.

    The loser pays systems is also known as English Rule because of it was at one time used in Britain. Britain however is moving away from the loser pays systems points out the Dallas Texas Auto Accident Attorney. In a recent report their Ministry of Justice recommends changing to an "American Rule" in which people would pay their own legal costs so that all citizens could have a chance at a fair trial heard in court.

    The loser pays system does not work in England and has failed miserably in the United States as well. It is important to learn from history says Dallas Auto Accident Attorney Amy Witherite and looking back only a few short years we can see the failure of a loser pays system in the Florida courts. If the tort reform passes the Texas House and Senate, Texans rights as American citizens will be suppressed by the fear of financial ruin.

    For more information on the Dallas Texas Auto Accident Attorneys at 1800-Car-Wreck and leading Dallas Auto Accident Attorney Amy Witherite visit www.1800-Car-Wreck.com or connect with the Dallas Car Wreck Lawyers on Facebook at www.facebook.com/1800CarWreck for continued coverage of the loser pays tort reform.

    # # #

    Read more Press Releases by EIN Presswire:

    Source: http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/dallas-texas-auto-accident-attorney-news-how-will-loser-pays-effect-dallas-citizens-221064.php

    bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm bankruptcy attorney albuquerque

    Saturday, June 25, 2011

    Prosecutor objects to court-appointed attorney possibility - Boston Globe

    James ?Whitey?? Bulger was paying cash to rent his Santa Monica, Calif., apartment, and he had $800,000 on hand when he was arrested on Wednesday. Yet he still may get a free court-appointed lawyer to mount his defense.

    The issue remained unresolved yesterday when Bulger, the longtime fugitive South Boston gang leader accused of 19 murders as well as racketeering charges, appeared in US District Court. Bulger is being temporarily represented by defense attorney Peter B. Krupp, who called himself a ?provisional attorney?? yesterday.

    Bulger?s financial means took center stage in court when Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler asked if he could afford his own lawyer.

    ?Well, I could if you gave me my money back,?? Bulger said.

    ?You?ll have to talk to Mr. Kelly about that,?? Bowler told Bulger, referring to prosecutor Brian Kelly.

    But Kelly objected to the request for a court-appointed lawyer, noting that Bulger had $800,000 when he was arrested and suggesting that was not the extent of his resources.

    ?We think he has access to more cash,?? Kelly said. ?We certainly don?t think [the $800,000 found in the apartment] is his last stash.??

    Kelly, however, also acknowledged that the money probably was not earned honestly.

    ?He clearly didn?t make that on a paper route on Santa Monica Boulevard,?? he said.

    One former federal prosecutor who now works as a defense attorney for white-collar crimes said that any money Bulger had on hand would presumably be the fruit of illegal activity that would be seized by the government and unavailable for a defense.

    ?He could have earned $800,000 from being a drug dealer, but that?s forfeitable to the government and not his to use for his own purposes,?? said Michael D. Kendall, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery LLP in Boston and head of the firm?s White Collar Defense Group. ?Unless he has something from a truly clean source that was never used to facilitate a crime, the government gets to forfeit.??

    But the prosecutor in court also suggested that there are ?family resources?? available to Bulger, prompting a puzzled look from his brother, William M. Bulger, the former president of the state Senate and former president of the University of Massachusetts.

    William Bulger received a $960,000 severance package and a steep pension for his decades of work in state government after he stepped down under political pressure after revelations that he had spoken with his fugitive brother while he was on the run.

    He ultimately won a legal battle to count extra benefits that boosted his annual pension to more than $200,000.

    Kendall ? a former federal prosecutor who helped generate evidence to turn bookmakers against Whitey Bulger ? said that many longtime criminals like gangsters and drug dealers have their funds seized by the government and are unable to use them to mount a defense. There are exceptions, however, he noted, citing one defendant who had legitimate life insurance proceeds from a deceased family member.

    The government would claim the money recovered in California, he said, but the victims of Bulger?s alleged crimes could also make a case for it and seek compensation.

    Families of Bulger?s alleged victims have already been awarded damages from the federal government in wrongful death lawsuits that blame FBI complicity for their murders.

    Stephanie Ebbert can be reached at ebbert@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @StephanieEbbert.

    � Copyright 2011 Globe Newspaper Company.

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNGukTVmeqTdKVW5iPNxSYSp_Oq0HA&url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/06/25/bulger_could_get_court_appointed_lawyer/

    bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm bankruptcy attorney albuquerque M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer

    Attorney General defends case delays

    ALBUQUERQUE, NM (KRQE) - New Mexico's attorney general is on the defensive in the case against former Secretary of State Rebecca Vigil-Giron.

    It's a case that has already cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars and now Giron's attorney has filed yet another motion to dismiss the case.

    Voter education ads are the center of the fraud trail against Giron. An investigation was launched in 2007 looking into the $6 million that came from a federal program called the Help America Vote Act.� A 2008 federal audit couldn't account for how half of the money was spent and that led to a state indictment for Giron and several others.

    Since then, there have been dozens of motions filed by her attorney and that has been costly for the state.

    "A couple lawyers working for about a year working for plus or minus $80,000 a year 25 plus investigators. I'd say its been a few hundred thousand dollars we've spent on the Rebecca Vigil-Giron case," New Mexico Attorney General Gary King said on Friday.

    In mid-March a district court judge said that King's office had the appearance of a conflict of interest had to find a new prosecutor by June 17th.

    King says his office has put aside $200,000 to hire that special prosecutor, but it hasn't happened yet.

    "Ads have been placed and I hope the judge will look at that and see we are moving at a pace that's appropriate," King said.

    Earlier this week, Giron's attorney filed a motion to dismiss citing several delays and extensions requested by the attorney general.

    Giron said, "This is an abomination. The judge ordered the A.G. to have a special prosecutor in place by June 17th, not a process to find a special prosecutor."

    A hearing date on the latest motion to dismiss the case has not been set.

    A federal investigation was launched in March also looking into possible misuse of federal funds by Giron.

    Source: http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/politics/state_politics/attorney-general-defends-case-delays

    albuquerque bankruptcy bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm

    Attorney General bans Internet gambling at cyber cafes - South Coast Today

    Brian Fraga

    June 25, 2011 12:25 AM

    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley issued a new permanent regulation Friday that bans gambling at so-called Internet cafes.

    The regulation was filed under the Consumer Protection Act, and is nearly identical to an emergency measure the attorney general issued on April 17 after receiving complaints of alleged illegal gambling facilities across Massachusetts.

    The emergency regulations were filed one week after state police raided Internet cafes in Fairhaven and Fall River owned by Fall River City Councilor Leo Pelletier, as well another facility in Chicopee.

    Pelletier said Friday that he had not seen the new regulation, but added that he believed the courts ultimately will decide the legality of Internet cafes and gambling.

    "We think that we're right, and that's why we're fighting it in court," Pelletier said.

    In addition to the new regulation, Coakley's office said Friday it had initiated a criminal investigation into alleged illegal gaming at facilities that claimed to be Internet Cafes in Bristol and Hampden counties.

    Coakley said in a statement that the regulation will enforce "long-standing gambling laws and protect consumers.

    "The regulation makes clear that companies cannot skirt our laws by disguising gambling as something else, such as the sale of Internet access.

    These establishments were illegal when they started, and they are illegal now," Coakley said.

    Coakley's office issued the emergency regulation in April after questions arose about alleged unlawful gambling operations that had recently opened for business across Massachusetts.

    According to the Attorney General's Office, those businesses purported to sell goods such as phone cards, and services such as Internet gambling, as a pretext for unlawful lotteries, online slot parlors, sweepstakes and similar gambling.

    The new regulation makes clear those practices are illegal.

    Local municipal officials previously praised the new regulations, and said they would notify establishments of the order for them to cease operations.

    Pelletier said Friday he believed he had done nothing wrong, and said the attorney general should reconsider the regulations.

    "We'd like to get back to business," he said. "If everything works out, we'll be back."


    Reader Reaction We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Rules. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment. New comments are only accepted for two weeks from the date of publication.
    Not sure how to add your comment? Here's how

    Source: http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110625/NEWS/106250334/0/FRONTPAGE

    www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque albuquerque bankruptcy attorney

    APNewsBreak: Attorney says Kansas City, Kan., abortion clinic denied license from state - Washington Post

    TOPEKA, Kan. ? An attorney for a Kansas City, Kan., abortion clinic says it has been denied a state license that would allow it to continue performing abortions.

    Attorney Cheryl Pilate (PEYE?-leht) says the Aid for Women clinic received a notice Friday from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. The lack of a license means the clinic won?t be able to perform abortions, starting in July.

    The Aid to Women clinic is one of three abortion providers in Kansas.

    Pilate says the notice came without an inspection of the clinic and was based on disclosures it made in its application for a license.

    A new state law mandates a special licensing process for abortion providers, with the new rules to take effect in July.

    A spokeswoman for the department declined to comment.

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/apnewsbreak-attorney-says-kansas-city-kan-abortion-clinic-denied-license-from-state/2011/06/24/AGWo0bjH_story.html

    bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque albuquerque bankruptcy attorney

    Attorney Mark Lippman's statement about CNN story

    <b>CNN video:</b> Casey Anthony's parents don't believe their daughter is innocent, attorney says

    (CNN.com / June 23, 2011)

    Editor's note: Attorney Mark Lippman released this statement to the media late Wednesday in response to a segment on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360.

    From: Mark Lippman

    Subject: Anderson Cooper/ Gary Tuckman [sic]

    Orlando Attorney Mark Lippman Issues Media Statement


    ORLANDO - Orlando attorney Mark Lippman issued the following statement regarding the Anderson Cooper Show on June 22, 2011.

    This is to clarify the reporting done by Mr. Tuckman. First Mr. Tuckman was not given an exclusive interview. Mr. Tuckman approached Mark Lippman as he was leaving the Courthouse today and Mr. Lippman spoke with Mr. Tuckman for approximately four minutes. During this conversation Mr. Lippman was attempting to clarify that Mr. Tuckman had allowed other reports that he provided to various news agencies to become embellished . After this was identified to Mr. Tuckman, Mr. Lippman allowed Mr. Tuckman to make speculations regarding the Anthony family and a further conversation ensued. All of the statements given to Mr. Tuckman were not reported on the Anderson Cooper Show. While Mr. Lippman understands that Mr. Tuckman is a reporter, Mr. Lippman holds Mr. Tuckman to the standard that any and all statements should not be taken either out of context or misrepresent the idea that a breach of attorney client privilege was given specifically to him at any time or in any context. This statement will clear any misunderstanding that either Mr. Tuckman had or Mr. Lippman had with regard to the conversation.

    As you all know now on behalf of the Anthony Family, Lippman Law Offices, P.A. have done one of three things:

    1. Issued a statement.

    2. Done an interview either via television or radio.

    3. Specifically stated that a reporter can quote Mr. Lippman.

    Unfortunately these three things did not happen to today with regard to Mr. Tuckman. Therefore let Mr. Lippman will clarify statements made today. The Anthony family maintains that they simply want justice in this case. The Anthony family maintains they do NOT under any circumstance support any theory that the defense has put forward regarding George Anthony's actions. The Anthony family maintains that while they want both the State and Defense to do their jobs respectively, they do not under any circumstance wish to see that the State achieves the ultimate sanction that the State of Florida is looking for, which is the death penalty. The Anthony family maintains they want the truth about what has happened to their Grand Daughter. Finally Lippman Law Offices does not and will not condone the idea that attorney-client privilege was ever breached and any misunderstanding as to statements made should not be considered that the Anthony Family wants anything other than the things identified here.

    Mr. Lippman stated that he and his clients strive to continue with their original commitment that they want to keep the distractions from encumbering the presentation of the defense or the prosecution in this case and will not engage in further speculation or idle conversation. For further information or questions contact lippmanlaw@llopa.com or Lippman Law Offices, P.A. 255 South Orange Ave., #720, Orlando, FL 32801.

    Mark R. Lippman, Esq.

    Source: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/crime/os-casey-anthony-george-cindy-lippman20110623,0,3019280.story?track=rss

    M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque

    Friday, June 24, 2011

    Attorney asks chief justice, DOC to investigate execution problems - Atlanta Journal Constitution

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    An attorney for a man whose execution appeared to have been botched has asked Georgia?s chief justice to stop any more lethal injections until the Department of Corrections investigates what went wrong Thursday night.

    Attorney Brian Kammer also wrote Corrections Commissioner Brian Owens on Friday asking for ?an immediate independent investigation into what appear to have been serious problems attending the execution.?

    Roy Blankenship was put to death Thursday night for the murder of 78-year-old Sarah Mims Bowen in Savannah 33 years ago. In that execution, Georgia used a new sedative, pentobarbital, as the first of three drugs.

    According to witnesses, Blankenship grimaced, jerked, lunged from side-to-side, gasped and appeared to yell out during the three minutes immediately after the first drug was administered. Witnesses said his eyes remained open until the end, as had been the case with the two previous executions.

    This was the first time in an execution in Georgia that a condemned man has moved once the sedative was administered. Usually their eyes are closed once the drugs begin to flow.

    Blankenship's lawyer repeatedly noted in his appeals that the Danish company that makes pentobarbital has said the sedative was untested on humans and was not safely used in executions.

    ?DOC has had three problematic executions in a row, indicating serious and systemic problems in how DOC administers judicial lethal injections and that DOC cannot assure a humane, constitutional execution process,? Kammer wrote in his letter to Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Carol Hunstein.

    Kammer wrote in his letter to Owens, ?it is unconscionable to allow any further lethal injections to proceed until you have determined what is going wrong.?

    The Department of Corrections said in an email the agency will consult the state's lawyers and medical experts "to ensure our execution procedures are medically appropriate... We remain confident in our ability to carry out humane and dignified executions."

    Source: http://www.ajc.com/news/attorney-asks-chief-justice-987166.html

    albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers

    Attorney General Sues Tinley Body Scan Company for Fraud - Patch.com

    Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed suit Thursday against Tinley Park-based Heart Check America for pressuring consumers into buying expensive and, in many cases, needless body scans.

    The suit filed in Cook County Circuit Court charges Sheila Haddad and her son David Haddad, both of Tinley Park, with using unfair and deceptive business practices to pressure consumers into buying 10-year screening contracts for thousands of dollars plus annual dues and enrollment fees.

    The lawsuit says consumers are not evaluated by medical providers to determine whether the scans are medically appropriate, that sales claims of detecting cancer and other diseases were false and misleading, that the people selling the scans were not medically trained, and that consumers were not told of risks ahead of time?such as radiation exposure and false positives.

    It also alleges that the company called to solicit business from people on the National Do Not Call Registry. The lawsuit, too, states that some scan results were inaccurate.

    The suit included examples from three customers who said they paid thousands of dollars for scans and never received the results or the results were inaccurate.

    It states that patient Kathleen Collins-Kuba took the results of a $600 body scan to her own doctor who said told her they ?had no medical relevance.? Another scan showed she had a kidney stone on one side of her body while a scan done at Northwest Community Hospital showed the stone was on the opposite side.

    Another patient, Debora Braun, contacted Madigan's office after getting the runaround while trying to schedule a colonoscopy. She arrived for her appointment to find the company's Arlington Heights office closed and was told by building workers that no one had been there for about a month.

    Patient Judy Blazek filed a complaint after failing to receive scan results despite repeated requests. She visited the Tinley Park office only to find it closed and still has not gotten her results, the lawsuit alleges. Blazek worked at the company?s Tinley location for about a year before being laid off in April.

    Heart Check America operated offices at 2010 Arlington Heights Road in Arlington Heights and 9501 W. 171st St., Suite Q, in Tinley Park, as well as in other states. Both Illinois offices are closed and their phone numbers are disconnected.

    The company?s website has been replaced by a notice that a new website for a company called Health Screening Plus is coming soon. There is a link to a letter from Sheila Haddad stating that all contracts with Heart Check America are being serviced by Health Screening Plus at the 2010 Arlington Heights address. An 800 number on the letter is forwarded to the disconnected Tinley Park office number.

    The suit is seeking a civil penalty of $50,000, which could be doubled if there is proof of intent to defraud, and the state also is seeking to recoup the cost of the investigation and prosecution of the case.

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNHENRK74fujfLcLbCxgK0sjAw5c7g&url=http://tinleypark.patch.com/articles/attorney-general-sues-tinley-body-scan-company-for-fraud

    M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque

    City attorney moving to A.G.'s office

    [unable to retrieve full-text content]Topeka city attorney Jackie Williams, a former longtime federal prosecutor, will leave his job next week�to join the Kansas Attorney General?s Office. Attorney General Derek Schmidt said Wednesday that Williams would serve as assistant attorney general for consumer protection beginning July 1. ?Jackie Williams is among the most respected career prosecutors in Kansas,? Schmidt said. ?His ...

    Source: http://cjonline.com/news/2011-06-22/city-attorney-moving-ags-office

    albuquerque bankruptcy bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm

    Obama Expected to Make Long-Awaited Texas US Attorney Nomination - Main Justice

    Obama Expected to Make Long-Awaited Texas U.S. Attorney Nomination

    By Andrew Ramonas | June 24, 2011 10:58 am

    President Barack Obama is expected to nominate a U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas who is backed by the state?s Republican senators, but was not recommended by his party?s own House members, The Houston Chronicle reported Thursday.

    The nomination of Kenneth Magidson, an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Houston-based U.S. Attorney?s office, could come as soon as next week. If nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, Magidson would become the first appointed U.S. Attorney from the Obama administration to lead one of the four offices.

    The state?s Republican senators, John Cornyn and Kay Bailey Hutchison, recommended in 2009 that Obama nominate Magidson. The Texas House Democrats led by Rep. Lloyd Doggett didn?t publicly announce a recommendation for the post in 2009. But their first choice is lawyer Larry Veselka, a former Harris County Democratic Party chairman, according to The Chronicle.

    Home-state senators traditionally recommend candidates to the White House ? unless both of the state?s senators are of different parties than the president. In cases in which senators are of a different party than the president, the White House often relies on House members who are members of the president?s political party.

    But in Texas, Doggett and the state?s Republican senators submitted separate lists of U.S. Attorney candidates. Of the six announced U.S. Attorney candidates submitted to Obama in 2009, only two had the support of the Texas House Democrats and Republican senators.

    Obama nominated one of those two candidates, John B. Stevens Jr., last year for Eastern District of Texas U.S. Attorney. But he withdrew his name from consideration after the Senate Judiciary Committee stalled on his confirmation.

    Stevens was the only Texas U.S. Attorney nomination made by Obama thus far. Career prosecutors have led the four U.S. Attorneys? offices in the absence of Obama appointees. Texas is one of only a few states that don?t have at least one appointed U.S. Attorney in place.

    The Senate has confirmed 76 of Obama?s�U.S. Attorneys thus far. There are 93 U.S. Attorney posts across the nation.

    ?I?m a little dumbfounded by their inactivity and their unwillingness to move forward,? Cornyn told The Chronicle. ?They haven?t made this a priority.?

    White House spokesman Reid Cherlin told Main Justice in March that filling the U.S. Attorney vacancies in Texas ?is a priority? and the White House hoped ?to nominate candidates soon.?

    Don DeGabrielle, whom Bush appointed in 2006, resigned as Southern District of Texas U.S. Attorney in November 2008. Jose Angel Moreno has led the office since February 2010.

    RELATED POSTS:

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNF3oRw12IdvQkr29fZUTN0fYIojTg&url=http://www.mainjustice.com/2011/06/24/obama-expected-to-make-long-awaited-texas-u-s-attorney-nomination/

    albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque albuquerque bankruptcy attorney albuquerque bankruptcy bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm

    Video reveals Seattle attorney 'keying' car - The Seattle Times

    Originally published June 23, 2011 at 8:17 PM | Page modified June 23, 2011 at 11:33 PM

    It took only 10 seconds for attorney Ronald Clarke Mattson to circle a "bait car" and scratch the vehicle with his keys, according to a surveillance video released Thursday by the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.

    Earlier this month, Mattson, a lawyer since 1972, admitted he scratched three vehicles with his keys in the Columbia Center parking garage because he didn't like the way they were parked. He was given a one-year suspended sentence and was ordered to perform 240 hours of community service after pleading guilty to attempted second-degree malicious mischief, a gross misdemeanor.

    Because Mattson, 63, took responsibility for his actions, paid nearly $10,000 in restitution, took anger-management courses and had no previous criminal history, the charge was reduced from second-degree malicious mischief, a felony, Senior Deputy Prosecutor Mary Barbosa said at the time.

    Mattson's attorney, Matthew Honeywell, said he is under the impression "there is an investigation pending" by the Washington State Bar Association into Mattson's conduct. "He will cooperate with the investigation," said Honeywell, who declined further comment.

    Mattson was caught on camera by Columbia Center security staff during a sting operation after two people reported their vehicles had been vandalized on March 9 and 11, according to charging documents.

    In both incidents, the vehicles had been parked over the designated parking-space lines. In addition to the damage, insulting notes were left on the windshields criticizing the drivers. One driver was called a "dweeb" and the other an "idiot," according to the documents.

    One of the victims contacted building security staff, which hatched a plan to catch the culprit.

    On March 15, security staff parked a bait car in the garage so the vehicle straddled the lines of two spaces and aimed a surveillance camera at it. A security officer in a car nearby waited, charging paperwork said.

    The video, obtained by The Seattle Times through a public disclosure request, shows Mattson's silver Porsche entering the parking lot, with the bait car to his immediate left. Less than 10 seconds after the Porsche disappears from the frame, it can be seen being driven in reverse, past the bait car and eventually out of view of the camera.

    About three minutes elapse before Mattson enters the frame from the right. He walks between two cars and approaches the bait car in front of him. Carrying a bag in his left hand, he walks from the rear of the driver's side, circles around the front, and passes along the passenger side. His right hand appears to swipe the length of the car before he doubles back the way he came, making his way to the elevator.

    Information from Seattle Times archives is included in this report.

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNHFvh_SsYFlU7qxV5wfFXrYM4UPMQ&url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015410052_lawyervideo24m.html

    M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com

    Thursday, June 23, 2011

    Attorney wants St. George murder hearings closed



    St. George ? A St. George defense attorney wants the public and the press kept out of the pretrial hearings for a potential capital murder case, claiming there has already been "massive, highly prejudicial publicity."

    In motions filed this week in 5th District Court, attorney Aric Cramer writes that Paul C. Ashton faces "a serious and imminent threat to the fair administration of justice" if Judge James L. Shumate does not exclude reporters and the general public from all pretrial hearings and prevent anyone involved in the case from releasing information to anyone in the news media.

    "I?m concerned about the poisoning of the jury pool," Cramer said Thursday. "I know it?s an extreme measure. But when death is a possibility, I have to take all precautions."

    Ashton, 32, is one of two men charged with aggravated murder in the deaths of Brandie Sue Dawn Jerden, 27, and Jerrica Christensen, 20, who were killed in a St. George apartment early Dec. 11, 2010.

    According to the charges, Ashton shot and killed one of the women inside the apartment at 575 S. Main and also shot and injured 28-year-old James Fiske. Another man, Brandon P. Smith, 29, then killed the other woman ? who died as a result of "incised wounds" ? to keep her from testifying, court documents state.

    Prosecutors charged Ashton with two counts of aggravated murder, a first-degree felony; one count of attempted aggravated murder, a first-degree felony; and one count of possession of a controlled substance, a third-degree felony. Prosecutors charged Smith with aggravated murder, a first-degree felony; and aggravated assault, a third-degree felony.

    Officials have not identified a motive for the attack.

    Cramer said his client was helping out when he allowed Jerden and her boyfriend Matt McNee to stay at his townhouse.

    Cramer said that Ashton asked Jerden and McNee to move out shortly after they settled in, believing they were stealing items from him.

    Christensen and her friend, Fiske, were asked to help with the move. It was while they were moving out that the scene got tense and Ashton called Smith and told him he was "in fear for his life," according to Cramer, adding his client at the time had a fractured leg and was confined to a wheelchair.

    Cramer said when Smith arrived, he gave Ashton a .357 Magnum and he kept a 9 mm handgun for himself.

    Tensions continued to escalate, according to Cramer, until Jerden hit Ashton in the head with a toolbox and he allegedly shot and killed her with the .357, then allegedly turned the gun on Fiske, wounding him in the shoulder.

    Cramer alleges it was Smith who found Christensen in the bathroom and stabbed her at least three times.

    No one else was charged with a crime, and Fiske has recovered from his wound.

    Attempts to reach Smith?s attorney were unsuccessful.

    Prosecutors have until 60 days after the arraignment following a preliminary hearing to announce whether they intend to seek the death penalty for Ashton and Smith.

    Next Page �

    Source: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52063436-78/murder-ashton-george-aggravated.html.csp

    M Daniels Law www.mdanielslaw.com albuquerque bankruptcy lawyer albuquerque bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque

    Attorney, bondsman arrested in racketeering case of ex-Judge Limas - McAllen Monitor

    [unable to retrieve full-text content]An attorney and a bondsman were arrested in connection with the bribery and extortion schemes of former 404th state District Judge Abel C. Limas as the puzzle laid out in the disgraced judicial officer?s indictment continues to take shape. Ray R. Marchan ...

    Source: http://www.themonitor.com/news/attorney-52051-bondsman-limas.html

    bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm bankruptcy attorney albuquerque

    Casey Anthony's parents do not think she is innocent, family attorney told CNN - Chicago Tribune

    <b>CNN video:</b> Casey Anthony's parents don't believe their daughter is innocent, attorney says

    (CNN.com / June 23, 2011)

    Mark Lippman, the attorney for the parents of accused child-killer Casey Anthony, denied the CNN report that his clients think Casey Anthony is guilty of killing her 2-year-old daughter Caylee Marie.

    Lippman did not appear on camera during the Anderson Cooper 360 report that aired Wednesday on CNN, but he spoke about that interview this morning from the Orange County Courthouse during a break in testimony in the Casey Anthony murder trial.

    "I've never said they thought she was guilty," Lippman said. "I only said they have no idea what happened. They have no idea what the facts are. That's why they're sitting in the courtroom every single day. They hope they can get some semblance of truth."

    Lippman added that "obviously" there was some misunderstanding in the reporting.

    He said his statements were taken and "qualified to say that my clients think she is guilty...Based on his story it sounds like I was saying my clients think she is guilty of murder. I never said that. And any inference to that is wrong."

    Reporter Gary Tuchman started the segment on CNN by stating he didn't "want to sensationalize this."

    He continued the report by saying he asked Lippman: "Do your clients George and Cindy Anthony think that [Casey Anthony] is not guilty?"

    Lippman's response was that "they don't think that?they do not believe she is innocent," Tuchman told Cooper.

    Tuchman added that Lippman stressed that his clients "support her and don't want her to get the death penalty."

    On Wednesday, Lippman fired off a statement after the show aired, stating that he had allowed Tuchman "to make speculations regarding the Anthony family" during a four-minute interview outside the Orange County Courthouse.

    The lawyer's statement shows the Anthonys "simply want justice in this case" and do not support the defense team's allegations "regarding George Anthony's actions" of sexual abuse and helping his daughter dispose of Caylee's body.

    His statement also shows the Anthonys do not want their daughter to receive the death penalty.

    wpacheco@tribune.com or 407-420-6262.

    Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNG_glP1qvirhYv0O88uenFripWlyQ&url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/os-casey-anthony-george-cindy-cnn-20110623,0,2311080.story

    bankruptcy lawyers albuquerque albuquerque bankruptcy attorney albuquerque bankruptcy bankruptcy lawyers in albuquerque nm bankruptcy attorney albuquerque